Found problems: 1385
Alphonse and Beryl are playing a game. The game starts with two rectangles with integer side lengths. The players alternate turns, with Alphonse going first. On their turn, a player chooses one rectangle, and makes a cut parallel to a side, cutting the rectangle into two pieces, each of which has integer side lengths. The player then discards one of the three rectangles (either the one they did not cut, or one of the two pieces they cut) leaving two rectangles for the other player. A player loses if they cannot cut a rectangle.
Determine who wins each of the following games:
(a) The starting rectangles are $1 \times 2020$ and $2 \times 4040$.
(b) The starting rectangles are $100 \times 100$ and $100 \times 500$.
Olga and Sasha play a game on an infinite hexagonal grid. They take turns in placing a stone on a free hexagon of their choice. Olga starts the game. Just before the $2018$th stone is placed, a new rule comes into play. A stone may now be placed only on those free hexagons having at least two occupied neighbors.
A player loses when she or he either is unable to make a move, or makes a move such that a pattern of the rhomboid shape as shown (rotated in any possible way) appears. Determine which player, if any, possesses a winning strategy.
With $2018$ points, a network composed of hexagons is formed as a sample the figure:
[asy]
unitsize(1 cm);
int i;
path hex = dir(30)--(0,1)--dir(150)--dir(210)--(0,-1)--dir(330)--cycle;
draw(hex);
draw(shift((sqrt(3),0))*(hex));
draw(shift((2*sqrt(3),0))*(hex));
draw(shift((4*sqrt(3),0))*(hex));
draw(shift((5*sqrt(3),0))*(hex));
dot((3*sqrt(3) - 0.3,0));
dot((3*sqrt(3),0));
dot((3*sqrt(3) + 0.3,0));
dot(dir(150));
dot(dir(210));
for (i = 0; i <= 5; ++i) {
if (i != 3) {
dot((0,1) + i*(sqrt(3),0));
dot(dir(30) + i*(sqrt(3),0));
dot(dir(330) + i*(sqrt(3),0));
dot((0,-1) + i*(sqrt(3),0));
}
}
dot(dir(150) + 4*(sqrt(3),0));
dot(dir(210) + 4*(sqrt(3),0));
[/asy]
A bee and a fly play the following game:
initially the bee chooses one of the $2018$ dots and paints it red, then the fly chooses one of the $2017$ unpainted dots and paint it blue. Then the bee chooses an unpainted point and paints it red and then the fly chooses an unpainted one and paints it blue and so they alternate. If at the end of the game there is an equilateral triangle with red vertices, the bee wins, otherwise Otherwise the fly wins.
Determine which of the two insects has a winning strategy.
For a positive integer $n$, two payers $A$ and $B$ play the following game: Given a pile of $s$ stones, the players take turn alternatively with $A$ going first. On each turn the player is allowed to take either one stone, or a prime number of stones, or a positive multiple of $n$ stones. The winner is the one who takes the last stone. Assuming both $A$ and $B$ play perfectly, for how many values of $s$ the player $A$ cannot win?
SQUARING OFF: Master Chief and Samus Aran take turns firing rockets at one another from across the Cartesian plane. Master Chief’s movement is restricted to lattice points within the $10\times 10$ square with vertices $(0,0)$, $(0,10)$, $(10,0)$, and $(10,10)$, while Samus Aran’s movement is restricted to lattice points inside the $10\times 10$ square with vertices $(0,0)$, $(-10,0)$, $(0,-10)$, and $(-10,-10)$. Neither player can be located on or beyond the border of his or her square. Both players randomly choose a lattice point at which they begin the game, and do not move the rest of the game (until either they are killed or kill the other player).
Each player’s turn consists of firing a rocket, targeted at a specific undestroyed lattice point inside the border of the opponent’s movement square, which hits immediately. When a rocket hits its intended lattice point, it explodes, destroying the surrounding $3\times 3$ square ($8$ additional adjacent lattice points).
The game ends when one player is hit by a rocket (when the player is located within the $3\times 3$ grid hit by a rocket). If the highest possible probability that Samus Aran wins the game in three turns or less, assuming Master Chief goes first, is expressed as $a/b$, where $a$ and $b$ are relatively prime integers, find $a+b$.
John and James wish to divide $25$ coins, of denominations $1, 2, 3, \ldots , 25$ kopeks. In each move, one of them chooses a coin, and the other player decides who must take this coin. John makes the initial choice of a coin, and in subsequent moves, the choice is made by the player having more kopeks at the time. In the event that there is a tie, the choice is made by the same player in the preceding move. After all the coins have been taken, the player with more kopeks wins. Which player has a winning strategy?
[i](5 points)[/i]
A square measuring $15$ by $15$ is partitioned into five rows of five congruent squares as shown below. The small squares are alternately colored black and white as shown. Find the total area of the part colored black.
[asy]
size(150);
defaultpen(linewidth(0.8));
int i,j;
for(i=1;i<=5;i=i+1)
{
for(j=1;j<=5;j=j+1)
{
if (floor((i+j)/2)==((i+j)/2))
{
filldraw(shift((i-1,j-1))*unitsquare,gray);
}
else
{
draw(shift((i-1,j-1))*unitsquare);
}
}
}
[/asy]
Each face of a regular tetrahedron with edge length $2011$ is divided into $2011^2$ equilateral triangles of side length $1$, created by drawing lines parallel to each edge. Bruno and Mariano take turns marking one of the unit triangles. Except for the first move, every triangle marked must share at least one point with the triangle marked in the previous move. Bruno plays first. The game ends when a player cannot make a move, and that player loses.
Determine which of the two players has a winning strategy and describe the strategy.
Let $n$ be a given positive integer. Sisyphus performs a sequence of turns on a board consisting of $n + 1$ squares in a row, numbered $0$ to $n$ from left to right. Initially, $n$ stones are put into square $0$, and the other squares are empty. At every turn, Sisyphus chooses any nonempty square, say with $k$ stones, takes one of these stones and moves it to the right by at most $k$ squares (the stone should say within the board). Sisyphus' aim is to move all $n$ stones to square $n$.
Prove that Sisyphus cannot reach the aim in less than
\[ \left \lceil \frac{n}{1} \right \rceil + \left \lceil \frac{n}{2} \right \rceil + \left \lceil \frac{n}{3} \right \rceil + \dots + \left \lceil \frac{n}{n} \right \rceil \]
turns. (As usual, $\lceil x \rceil$ stands for the least integer not smaller than $x$. )
Two players are playing game. Players alternately write down one natural number greater than $1$, but it is not allowed to write linear combination previously written numbers with nonnegative integer coefficients. Player lose a game if he can't write a new number. Does any of players can have wiining strategy, if yes, then which one of them?
[i]Journal "Kvant" / Aleksandar Ilic[/i]
General Tilly and the Duke of Wallenstein play "Divide and rule!" (Divide et impera!).
To this end, they arrange $N$ tin soldiers in $M$ companies and command them by turns.
Both of them must give a command and execute it in their turn.
Only two commands are possible: The command "[i]Divide![/i]" chooses one company and divides it into two companies, where the commander is free to choose their size, the only condition being that both companies must contain at least one tin soldier.
On the other hand, the command "[i]Rule![/i]" removes exactly one tin soldier from each company.
The game is lost if in your turn you can't give a command without losing a company. Wallenstein starts to command.
a) Can he force Tilly to lose if they start with $7$ companies of $7$ tin soldiers each?
b) Who loses if they start with $M \ge 1$ companies consisting of $n_1 \ge 1, n_2 \ge 1, \dotsc, n_M \ge 1$ $(n_1+n_2+\dotsc+n_M=N)$ tin soldiers?
Let $n$ be an integer greater than 2. A positive integer is said to be [i]attainable [/i]if it is 1 or can be obtained from 1 by a sequence of operations with the following properties:
1.) The first operation is either addition or multiplication.
2.) Thereafter, additions and multiplications are used alternately.
3.) In each addition, one can choose independently whether to add 2 or $n$
4.) In each multiplication, one can choose independently whether to multiply by 2 or by $n$.
A positive integer which cannot be so obtained is said to be [i]unattainable[/i].
[b]a.)[/b] Prove that if $n\geq 9$, there are infinitely many unattainable positive integers.
[b]b.)[/b] Prove that if $n=3$, all positive integers except 7 are attainable.
Soma has a tower of $63$ bricks , consisting of $6$ levels. On the $k$-th level from the top, there are $2k-1$ bricks (where $k = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6$), and every brick which is not on the lowest level lies on precisely $2$ smaller bricks (which lie one level below) - see the figure. Soma takes away $7$ bricks from the tower, one by one. He can only remove a brick if there is no brick lying on it. In how many ways can he do this, if the order of removals is considered as well?
[img]https://cdn.artofproblemsolving.com/attachments/b/6/4b0ce36df21fba89708dd5897c43a077d86b5e.png[/img]
Let $n$ be a positive integer. Two players $A$ and $B$ play a game in which they take turns choosing positive integers $k \le n$. The rules of the game are:
(i) A player cannot choose a number that has been chosen by either player on any previous turn.
(ii) A player cannot choose a number consecutive to any of those the player has already chosen on any previous turn.
(iii) The game is a draw if all numbers have been chosen; otherwise the player who cannot choose a number anymore loses the game.
The player $A$ takes the first turn. Determine the outcome of the game, assuming that both players use optimal strategies.
[i]Proposed by Finland[/i]
Vlad draws 100 rays in the Euclidean plane. David then draws a line $\ell$ and pays Vlad one pound for each ray that $\ell$ intersects. Naturally, David wants to pay as little as possible. What is the largest amount of money that Vlad can get from David?
[i]Proposed by Vlad Spătaru[/i]
There are $8$ cards on which the numbers $1$, $2$, $\dots$, $8$ are written respectively. Alice and Bob play the following game: in each turn, Alice gives two cards to Bob, who must keep one card and discard the other. The game proceeds for four turns in total; in the first two turns, Bob cannot keep both of the cards with the larger numbers, and in the last two turns, Bob also cannot keep both of the cards with the larger numbers. Let $S$ be the sum of the numbers written on the cards that Bob keeps. Find the greatest positive integer $N$ for which Bob can guarantee that $S$ is at least $N$.
Petya and Vasya are playing on an $100\times 100$ board. Initially, all the cells of the board are white. With each of his moves, Petya paints one or more white cells standing on the same diagonal in black. With each of his moves, Vasya paints one or more white cells standing on the same column in black. Petya makes the first move. The one who can't make a move loses. Who has a winning strategy?
[i]Proposed by M. Didin[/i]
Initially, $10$ ones are written on a blackboard. Grisha and Gleb are playing game, by taking turns; Grisha goes first. On one move Grisha squares some $5$ numbers on the board. On his move, Gleb picks a few (perhaps none) numbers on the board and increases each of them by $1$. If in $10,000$ moves on the board a number divisible by $2023$ appears, Gleb wins, otherwise Grisha wins. Which of the players has a winning strategy?
Let $n$ be a given positive integer. Sisyphus performs a sequence of turns on a board consisting of $n + 1$ squares in a row, numbered $0$ to $n$ from left to right. Initially, $n$ stones are put into square $0$, and the other squares are empty. At every turn, Sisyphus chooses any nonempty square, say with $k$ stones, takes one of these stones and moves it to the right by at most $k$ squares (the stone should say within the board). Sisyphus' aim is to move all $n$ stones to square $n$.
Prove that Sisyphus cannot reach the aim in less than
\[ \left \lceil \frac{n}{1} \right \rceil + \left \lceil \frac{n}{2} \right \rceil + \left \lceil \frac{n}{3} \right \rceil + \dots + \left \lceil \frac{n}{n} \right \rceil \]
turns. (As usual, $\lceil x \rceil$ stands for the least integer not smaller than $x$. )
Elmo and Elmo's clone are playing a game. Initially, $n\geq 3$ points are given on a circle. On a player's turn, that player must draw a triangle using three unused points as vertices, without creating any crossing edges. The first player who cannot move loses. If Elmo's clone goes first and players alternate turns, who wins? (Your answer may be in terms of $n$.)
[i]Proposed by Milan Haiman[/i]
Let $n> 1$ be a positive integer. Danielle chooses a number $N$ of $n$ digits but does not tell her students and they must find the sum of the digits of $N$. To achieve this, each student chooses and says once a number of $n$ digits to Danielle and she tells how many digits are in the correct location compared with $N$. Find the minimum number of students that must be in the class to ensure that students have a strategy to correctly find the sum of the digits of $N$ in any case and show a strategy in that case.
On the circumference of a circle there are red and blue points. One may add a red point and change the colour of both its neighbours (to the other colour) or remove a red point and change the colour of both its previous neighbours. Initially there are two red points. Prove that there is no sequence of allowed operations which leads to the configuration consisting of two blue points.
(K Kazarnovskiy, Moscow)
Raashan, Sylvia, and Ted play the following game. Each starts with $\$1$. A bell rings every $15$ seconds, at which time each of the players who currently have money simultaneously chooses one of the other two players independently and at random and gives $\$1$ to that player. What is the probability that after the bell has rung $2019$ times, each player will have $\$1$? (For example, Raashan and Ted may each decide to give $\$1$ to Sylvia, and Sylvia may decide to give her dollar to Ted, at which point Raashan will have $\$0$, Sylvia would have $\$2$, and Ted would have $\$1$, and and that is the end of the first round of play. In the second round Raashan has no money to give, but Sylvia and Ted might choose each other to give their $\$1$ to, and and the holdings will be the same as the end of the second [sic] round.
$\textbf{(A) } \frac{1}{7} \qquad\textbf{(B) } \frac{1}{4} \qquad\textbf{(C) } \frac{1}{3} \qquad\textbf{(D) } \frac{1}{2} \qquad\textbf{(E) } \frac{2}{3}$
A policeman is trying to catch a robber on a board of $2001\times2001$ squares. They play alternately, and the player whose trun it is moves to a space in one of the following directions: $\downarrow,\rightarrow,\nwarrow$.
If the policeman is on the square in the bottom-right corner, he can go directly to the square in the upper-left corner (the robber can not do this). Initially the policeman is in the central square, and the robber is in the upper-left adjacent square. Show that:
$a)$ The robber may move at least $10000$ times before the being captured.
$b)$ The policeman has an strategy such that he will eventually catch the robber.
Note: The policeman can catch the robber if he reaches the square where the robber is, but not if the robber enters the square occupied by the policeman.
There are $k$ heaps on the table, each containing a different positive number of stones. Juri and Mari make moves alternatingly, Juri starts. On each move, the player making the move has to pick a heap and remove one or more stones in it from the table; in addition, the player is allowed to distribute any number of remaining stones from that heap in any way between other non-empty heaps. The player to remove the last stone from the table wins. For which positive integers $k$ does Juri have a winning strategy for any initial state that satisfies the conditions?