Found problems: 622
Alice and Bob play the following game: Alice picks a set $A = \{1, 2, ..., n \}$ for some natural number $n \ge 2$. Then, starting from Bob, they alternatively choose one number from the set $A$, according to the following conditions: initially Bob chooses any number he wants, afterwards the number chosen at each step should be distinct from all the already chosen numbers and should differ by $1$ from an already chosen number. The game ends when all numbers from the set $A$ are chosen. Alice wins if the sum of all the numbers that she has chosen is composite. Otherwise Bob wins. Decide which player has a winning strategy.
Proposed by [i]Demetres Christofides, Cyprus[/i]
The numbers $1, 2, ..., 2020$ and $2021$ are written on a blackboard. The following operation is executed:
Two numbers are chosen, both are erased and replaced by the absolute value of their difference.
This operation is repeated until there is only one number left on the blackboard.
(a) Show that $2021$ can be the final number on the blackboard.
(b) Show that $2020$ cannot be the final number on the blackboard.
(Karl Czakler)
Let $n$ be a given positive integer. Sisyphus performs a sequence of turns on a board consisting of $n + 1$ squares in a row, numbered $0$ to $n$ from left to right. Initially, $n$ stones are put into square $0$, and the other squares are empty. At every turn, Sisyphus chooses any nonempty square, say with $k$ stones, takes one of these stones and moves it to the right by at most $k$ squares (the stone should say within the board). Sisyphus' aim is to move all $n$ stones to square $n$.
Prove that Sisyphus cannot reach the aim in less than
\[ \left \lceil \frac{n}{1} \right \rceil + \left \lceil \frac{n}{2} \right \rceil + \left \lceil \frac{n}{3} \right \rceil + \dots + \left \lceil \frac{n}{n} \right \rceil \]
turns. (As usual, $\lceil x \rceil$ stands for the least integer not smaller than $x$. )
$100$ ones are written in a circle. Petya and Vasya take turns making \( 10^{10} \) moves each. In each move, Petya chooses 9 consecutive numbers and decreases each by $2$. Vasya chooses $10$ consecutive numbers and increases each by $1$. They alternate turns, starting with Petya. Prove that Vasya can act in such a way that after each of his moves, there are always at least five positive numbers, regardless of how Petya plays. \\
Let it \(k\) be a fixed positive integer. Alberto and Beralto play the following game:
Given an initial number \(N_0\) and starting with Alberto, they alternately do the following operation: change the number \(n\) for a number \(m\) such that \(m < n\) and \(m\) and \(n\) differ, in its base-2 representation, in exactly \(l\) consecutive digits for some \(l\) such that \(1 \leq l \leq k\).
If someone can't play, he loses.
We say a non-negative integer \(t\) is a [i]winner[/i] number when the gamer who receives the number \(t\) has a winning strategy, that is, he can choose the next numbers in order to guarrantee his own victory, regardless the options of the other player.
Else, we call it [i]loser[/i].
Prove that, for every positive integer \(N\), the total of non-negative loser integers lesser than \(2^N\) is \(2^{N-\lfloor \frac{log(min\{N,k\})}{log 2} \rfloor}\)
On a chessboard $5 \times 9$ squares, the following game is played.
Initially, a number of frogs are randomly placed on some of the squares, no square containing more than one frog. A turn consists of moving all of the frogs subject to the following rules:
$\bullet$ Each frog may be moved one square up, down, left, or right;
$\bullet$ If a frog moves up or down on one turn, it must move left or right on the next turn, and vice versa;
$\bullet$ At the end of each turn, no square can contain two or more frogs.
The game stops if it becomes impossible to complete another turn. Prove that if initially $33$ frogs are placed on the board, the game must eventually stop. Prove also that it is possible to place $32$ frogs on the board so that the game can continue forever.
There is a row of $100N$ sandwiches with ham. A boy and his cat play a game. In one action the boy eats the first sandwich from any end of the row. In one action the cat either eats the ham from one sandwich or does nothing. The boy performs 100 actions in each of his turns, and the cat makes only 1 action each turn; the boy starts first. The boy wins if the last sandwich he eats contains ham. Is it true that he can win for any positive integer $N{}$ no matter how the cat plays?
[i]Ivan Mitrofanov[/i]
There are $2024$ mathematicians sitting in a row next to the river Tisza. Each of them is working on exactly one research topic, and if two mathematicians are working on the same topic, everyone sitting between them is also working on it.
Marvin is trying to figure out for each pair of mathematicians whether they are working on the same topic. He is allowed to ask each mathematician the following question: “How many of these 2024 mathematicians are working on your topic?” He asks the questions one by one, so he knows all previous answers before he asks the next one.
Determine the smallest positive integer $k$ such that Marvin can always accomplish his goal with at most $k$ questions.
Five identical empty buckets of $2$-liter capacity stand at the vertices of a regular pentagon. Cinderella and her wicked Stepmother go through a sequence of rounds: At the beginning of every round, the Stepmother takes one liter of water from the nearby river and distributes it arbitrarily over the five buckets. Then Cinderella chooses a pair of neighbouring buckets, empties them to the river and puts them back. Then the next round begins. The Stepmother goal's is to make one of these buckets overflow. Cinderella's goal is to prevent this. Can the wicked Stepmother enforce a bucket overflow?
[i]Proposed by Gerhard Woeginger, Netherlands[/i]
Rațiu and Horațiu are playing a game on a $100\times 100$ grid. They make moves alternatively, starting with Rațiu. At a move, a player places a token on an empty cell of the grid. If a player places a token on a cell which is adjacent to another cell with a token, he loses. Determine who has a winning strategy.
On a rectangular board $100 \times 300$, two people take turns coloring the cells that have not yet been colored. The first one colors cells in yellow, and the second one in blue. Coloring is completed when every cell of the board is colored. A [i]connected sequence[/i] of cells is a sequence of cells in which every two consecutive cells share a common side (and all cells in the sequence are different). Consider all possible connected sequences of yellow cells. The result of the first player is the number of cells in the connected sequence of yellow cells of maximum length. The first player's goal is to maximize the result, and the second player's goal is to make the first player's result as small as possible. Prove that if each player tries to achieve his goal, the result of the first player will be no more than $200$.
[i]Proposed by Mykhailo Shtandenko and Fedir Yudin[/i]
Mr. Ganzgenau would like to take his tea mug out of the microwave right at the front. But Mr. Ganzgenau's microwave doesn't really want to be very precise play along. To be precise, the two of them play the following game:
Let $n$ be a positive integer. The turntable of the microwave makes one in $n$ seconds full turn. Each time the microwave is switched on, an integer number of seconds turned either clockwise or counterclockwise so that there are n possible positions in which the tea mug can remain. One of these positions is right up front.
At the beginning, the microwave turns the tea mug to one of the $n$ possible positions. After that Mr. Ganzgenau enters an integer number of seconds in each move, and the microwave decides either clockwise or counterclockwise this number of spin for seconds.
For which $n$ can Mr. Ganzgenau force the tea cup after a finite number of puffs to be able to take it out of the microwave right up front?
(Birgit Vera Schmidt)
[hide=original wording, in case it doesn't make much sense]Herr Ganzgenau möchte sein Teehäferl ganz genau vorne aus der Mikrowelle herausnehmen. Die Mikrowelle von Herrn Ganzgenau möchte da aber so ganz genau gar nicht mitspielen.
Ganz genau gesagt spielen die beiden das folgende Spiel:
Sei n eine positive ganze Zahl. In n Sekunden macht der Drehteller der Mikrowelle eine vollständige Umdrehung. Bei jedem Einschalten der Mikrowelle wird eine ganzzahlige Anzahl von Sekunden entweder im oder gegen den Uhrzeigersinn gedreht, sodass es n mögliche Positionen gibt, auf denen das Teehäferl stehen bleiben kann. Eine dieser Positionen ist ganz genau vorne.
Zu Beginn dreht die Mikrowelle das Teehäferl auf eine der n möglichen Positionen. Danach gibt Herr Ganzgenau in jedem Zug eine ganzzahlige Anzahl von Sekunden ein, und die Mikrowelle entscheidet, entweder im oder gegen den Uhrzeigersinn diese Anzahl von Sekunden lang zu drehen.
Für welche n kann Herr Ganzgenau erzwingen, das Teehäferl nach endlich vielen Zügen ganz genau vorne aus der Mikrowelle nehmen zu können?
(Birgit Vera Schmidt) [/hide]
There are $4$ piles of stones with the following quantities: $1004$, $1005$, $2009$ and $2010$.
A legitimate move is to remove a stone from each from $3$ different piles. Two players $A$ and $B$ play in turns. $A$ begins the game . The player who, on his turn, cannot make a legitimate move, loses.
Determine which of the players has a winning strategy and give a strategy for that player.
Arne and Bertil play a game on an $11 \times 11$ grid. Arne starts. He has a game piece that is placed on the center od the grid at the beginning of the game. At each move he moves the piece one step horizontally or vertically. Bertil places a wall along each move any of an optional four squares. Arne is not allowed to move his piece through a wall. Arne wins if he manages to move the pice out of the board, while Bertil wins if he manages to prevent Arne from doing that. Who wins if from the beginning there are no walls on the game board and both players play optimally?
In the playboard shown beside, players $A$ and $B$ alternately fill the empty cells by integers, player $A$ starting. In each step the empty cell and the integer can be chosen arbitrarily. Show that player $A$ can always achieve that all the equalities hold after the last step.
[img]https://cdn.artofproblemsolving.com/attachments/c/0/524195b1a8ab8457b72005a162f8124c2b1bd2.png[/img]
a. View the second-degree quadratic equation $x^2+? x +? = 0$
Two players successively put an integer each at the location of a question mark. Show that the second player can always ensure that the quadratic gets two integer solutions.
Note: we say that the quadratic also has two integer solutions, even when they are equal (for example if they are both equal to $3$).
b.View the third-degree equation $x^3 +? x^2 +? x +? = 0$
Three players successively put an integer each at the location of a question mark. The equation appears to have three integer (possibly again the same) solutions. It is given that two players each put a $3$ in the place of a question mark. What number did the third player put? Determine that number and the place where it is placed and prove that only one number is possible.
There are two bowls on a table, one white and one black. In the white bowl there $2019$ balls.
Players $A$ and $B$ play a game where they make every other move ($A$ begins).
One move consists is
$\bullet$ to move one or your balls from one bowl to the other, or
$\bullet$ to remove a ball from the white bowl,
with the condition that the resulting position (that is, the number of bullets in the two bowls) have not occurred before. The player who has no valid move to make loses.
Can any of the players be sure to win? If so, which one?
On the board are written numbers $1, 2,. . . , 33$. In one step we select two numbers written on the product of which is the square of the natural number, we wipe off the two chosen numbers and write the square root of their product on the board. This way we continue to the board only the numbers remain so that the product of neither of them is a square. (In one we can also wipe out two identical numbers and replace them with the same number.) Prove that at least $16$ numbers remain on the board.
Hamza and Majid play a game on a horizontal $3 \times 2015$ white board. They alternate turns, with Hamza going first. A legal move for Hamza consists of painting three unit squares forming a horizontal $1 \times 3$ rectangle. A legal move for Majid consists of painting three unit squares forming a vertical $3\times 1$ rectangle. No one of the two players is allowed to repaint already painted squares. The last player to make a legal move wins. Which of the two players, Hamza or Majid, can guarantee a win no matter what strategy his opponent chooses and what is his strategy to guarantee a win?
Lê Anh Vinh
The following game is played with a group of $n$ people and $n+1$ hats are numbered from $1$ to $n+1.$ The people are blindfolded and each of them puts one of the $n+1$ hats on his head (the remaining hat is hidden). Now, a line is formed with the $n$ people, and their eyes are uncovered: each of them can see the numbers on the hats of the people standing in front of him. Now, starting from the last person (who can see all the other players) the players take turns to guess the number of the hat on their head, but no two players can guess the same number (each player hears all the guesses from the other players).
What is the highest number of guaranteed correct guesses, if the $n$ people can discuss a common strategy?
[i]Proposed by Viktor Kiss, Budapest[/i]
a) A game is played on an infinite plane. There are fifty one pieces, one “wolf” and $50$ “sheep”. There are two players. The first commences by moving the wolf. Then the second player moves one of the sheep, the first player moves the wolf, the second player moves a sheep, and so on. The wolf and the sheep can move in any direction through a distance of up to one metre per move. Is it true that for any starting position the wolf will be able to capture at least one sheep?
b) A game is played on an infinite plane. There are two players. One has a piece known as a “wolf”, while the other has $K$ pieces known as “sheep”. The first player moves the wolf, then the second player moves a sheep, the first player moves the wolf again, the second player moves a sheep, and so on. The wolf and the sheep can move in any direction, with a maximum distance of one metre per move. Is it true that for any value of $K$ there exists an initial position from which the wolf can not capture any sheep?
PS. (a) was the junior version, (b) the senior one
Alexey and Bogdan play a game with two piles of stones. In the beginning, one of the piles contains $2021$ stones, and the second is empty. In one move, each of the guys has to pick up an even number of stones (more than zero) from an arbitrary pile, then transfer half of the stones taken to another pile, and the other half - to remove from the game. Loses the one who cannot make a move. Who will win this game if both strive to win, and Bogdan begins?
(Oleksii Masalitin)
We are given a row of $n\geq7$ tiles. In the leftmost 3 tiles, there is a white piece each, and in the rightmost 3 tiles, there is a black piece each. The white and black players play in turns (the white starts). In each move, a player may take a piece of their color, and move it to an adjacent tile, so long as it's not occupied by a piece of the [u]same color[/u]. If the new tile is empty, nothing happens. If the tile is occupied by a piece of the [u]opposite color[/u], both pieces are destroyed (both white and black). The player who destroys the last two pieces wins the game.
Which player has a winning strategy, and what is it? (The answer may depend on $n$)
Given a $101\times 200$ sheet of graph paper, we start moving from a corner square in the direction of the square’s diagonal (not the sheet’s diagonal) to the border of the sheet, then change direction obeying the laws of light’s reflection. Will we ever reach a corner square?
[img]https://cdn.artofproblemsolving.com/attachments/b/8/4ec2f4583f406feda004c7fb4f11a424c9b9ae.png[/img]
An integer is given $N> 1$. Arne and Britt play the following game:
(1) Arne says a positive integer $A$.
(2) Britt says an integer $B> 1$ that is either a divisor of $A$ or a multiple of $A$. ($A$ itself is a possibility.)
(3) Arne says a new number $A$ that is either $B - 1, B$ or $B + 1$.
The game continues by repeating steps 2 and 3. Britt wins if she is okay with being told the number $N$ before the $50$th has been said. Otherwise, Arne wins.
a) Show that Arne has a winning strategy if $N = 10$.
b) Show that Britt has a winning strategy if $N = 24$.
c) For which $N$ does Britt have a winning strategy?